The President’s opinion

Today I’m taking the liberty of addressing a very hot topic. Now that the coronavirus infection figures are on the rise again (still harmless compared to the flu and other rhinoviruses, but still) and vaccination with an adapted vaccine is being recommended again for people at risk, here is a compilation of various studies and links (although some of us would like to wish the topic to hell).
As many people know, I was critical of the story right from the start. At the very beginning, it was important to react and take the figures seriously.

The SAoO also published information videos and sent out updated newsletters at the start of the pandemic. I explained at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic that this pandemic will be a unique opportunity for all countries to review the suitability of their epidemic laws.
Incidentally, this has already happened in Switzerland, rather quietly in my opinion. Who has noticed that parliament has passed an adapted epidemic law? In my opinion, it was poorly adapted, but that’s my personal opinion.
However, there is still heated debate around the world, e.g. here , or here and researched, including this important Swiss
Study: .
If you prefer to watch a video instead of reading for a long time: please click here.

The epidemiologists are challenged. Did you know that North Dakota and South Dakota, two US states of almost equal size, which had imposed very different corona measures (one very strict, the other quite relaxed), ended up with practically the same number of deaths, intensive care bed patients, SARS-CoV2 patients in general and even the same number of LongCovid patients? What do we make of this now?

And of course the question always arises: How is this data actually collected? At the moment, a lot of data is being taken apart, scrutinized and processed very carefully (e.g. how difficult it is to distinguish between “on corona“ and “with corona“, or how the German RKI has still not been able to process all the data correctly) true to the motto: “Only believe statistics that you have falsified yourself“. Interesting things are already coming to light. For example, the Paul Ehrlich Institute has been withholding vaccination data for years. Why do you think?

It is also a rather new phenomenon to receive blackened documents from official bodies, and a further.
, for the complete info please Substack by Dr. Pain.

E.g. from www.ecodibergamo.it
Update Comirnaty: New revelations of embarrassing redacted republications : The epidemic in Italy originally emanating from Bergamo was self-made

First:
Most of the deaths were caused by the fact that the only hospital in the region had to be emptied and those suffering from Covid-19 were transferred to old people’s homes, where there were not enough nursing staff or hygiene materials. The inmates there died.

Secondly:
Based on these figures alone, which can be compared with many others, it was completely exaggerated to speak of a pandemic in spring 2020. We had localized outbreaks, mostly limited to cities or regions, which also subsided relatively quickly.
Thirdly:
The famous images of military trucks full of coffins were also self-inflicted: For fear of the virus, the state banned the burial that was common in Italy and ordered the cremation of all infected deceased. However, there were only two functioning crematoria, and they were hopelessly overcrowded.
Fourthly:
The later waves were all caused by mandatory PCR tests, another devastating decision because a positive PCR test said nothing about the actual infectivity of the test subjects.
There are many other interesting details that will not be explained in detail here, but today we know that the authorities had a clear objective: To scare the population. The state-sanctioned fake news was born

¹_{There are many more interesting details that are not covered here.
in detail, but today we know that there is a clear objective on the part of the authorities to
There was: scaring the population. The state-sanctioned fake news was born.
² The biologist and recognized biochemist deals with the fact that
we know quite little about the mechanisms of how exactly the cell folds its proteins, and - the
is the more dramatic}

The story is certainly being dealt with. Ordinary mortals simply don’t find out about it, and if you’re not interested in vaccination issues, immunology or epidemiology, a lot of things just don’t interest the general public.
However, not only satirical indictments are published (e.g. the highly intelligent and very amusingly written book by Sabine C. Stebel “Grenzdebile Schwachsinnsideen im Protein Engineering am Beispiel des Spike Proteins“ (published by Hesper-Verlag) or the book by Celia Faber “Schwerwiegende unerwünschte Ereignisse “), but also very seriously conducted studies that should make us alert and thoughtful. For example, there is a very recent, very detailed birth cohort study “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children“ which, in brief, shows that vaccinated children have a threefold higher risk of chronic health problems than unvaccinated children. Incidentally, a study conducted between 2005 and 2015 came to very similar conclusions. This not only casts an oblique light on the officially recommended vaccination of children and adolescents during the coronavirus pandemic, but also calls the currently discussed vaccination requirements and plans into question at least a little. In Florida, Health Secretary Joseph Lapado has already commented on this, which has earned him a lot of vicious criticism in the mainstream press (Die Zeit: “...the next step in an insane campaign that also jeopardizes US national security“).
could“).
But things are getting even weirder, because the current birth mortality figures are rising again in almost all countries where this is recorded with some degree of accuracy, and have been doing so continuously since 2021.
It can be shown - and this is once again thought-provoking - that there is a difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated (in this case
Corona) mothers giving birth.

The extent to which “science“ is struggling with the issue can be seen in the background. Highly controversial studies such as “Synthetic mRNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: evidence of emerging side effects and cancers after vaccination“ (von Ranke, Zhang, Anokin, Hulscher et al.) are withdrawn “at the request of the advisory board“, while others can “unfortunately“ no longer be removed due to the clear data, see here.

However, one question that arises is not discussed at all. Why don’t the vaccines actually do what we would like them to do? The idea is so obvious, even brilliant: We give our immune system a weakened or killed germ, an allergen that has been rendered harmless, so that our immune system can learn what the bad thing looks like and can later carry out the fight against it quickly and efficiently. That’s what we learned in our studies.
The crux of the matter lies in the detail: How exactly is the allergen produced? How exactly are “the germs“ killed or weakened? What exactly do so-called catalysts such as aluminum colloids do? Are we even interested in this or do we believe the industry-sponsored studies? Is the spike protein really “harmless“ if we inject the modified blueprint (modRNA = Moderna) into the muscle and hope that the cells will get it right?
It should actually give us pause for thought when the WHO changes the definition of vaccine twice in the last few years and treats vaccines completely differently to pharmaceuticals, for example (50 deaths after the introduction of a new drug: the product is taken off the market immediately. 50 deaths after vaccination: peanuts!).
Perhaps it would do us good to deal with the issue more often and more intensively? When are the risks of a vaccination higher than the infection or disease itself? Can we really fulfill our dream of vaccinating against cancer? (Read the HPV studies very carefully! And above all, wait another 10 years and then don’t be surprised about certain “inconsistencies“). Doesn’t it sometimes simply make more sense to develop pharmacological therapies instead of trusting the manipulation of our immune system, which we understand less about than pharmacodynamics?

_{Part - that for the corona vaccines it has neither been proven whether and that enough correct
folded spike proteins are built up in the cells, nor has it been checked how many non
correctly folded proteins are present and, above all, what exactly they do in the cell or in the
body. Frightening and almost unimaginable for a serious medical practitioner.}

To conclude this essay, I would like to say something to calm any angry feelings:
I am only writing all this down here to point out inconsistencies and grievances, but in the humanistic and also entirely Christian sense that we should always be aware of justice, equality and responsibility towards creation and that these should also be our goal in life.

As always, I welcome comments, contributions to the discussion, criticism and corrections.

In this sense
Your President

Dietmar Thumm